Home » Trump’s best move for Iran: Regime change, bombs, or nothing?

Trump’s best move for Iran: Regime change, bombs, or nothing?

The prospect of U.S. military involvement in the escalating Israel-Iran conflict has created a bitter rift among the MAGA coalition. Interventionists are pushing for U.S. support of Israel’s strikes, arguing it’s in America’s best interest to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons, while isolationists oppose involvement, contending that America ought to focus on her long list of domestic issues.
While others in the conservative movement are making “bold declarations” of what to do in Iran, Glenn Beck is “not recommending anything” and is instead “asking questions.”

“A nuclear armed Iran is really bad, but I want Israel to take care of it. I don’t want to be involved,” he says.
Someone else who is taking a similar nuanced approach is Sean Davis, CEO and co-founder of the Federalist. On a recent episode of “The Glenn Beck Program,” Glenn and Sean discussed the various paths Trump could take — none of which, they admit, are great.

“Wedon’twantbadpeople”—especially“ourenemies”—“tohaveweaponstheycouldusetodestroyusorourfriends,”saysDavis.“Ithinkprobablyeveryoneagreesont